I am interested in the topics that deal with human growth and progress. Life is meant to be lived joyfully and happily. If one reaches out to the other in love and concern, the world would be a better place to live in. Everybody needs love to grow into genuine human persons.
Saturday, 24 March 2018
Thank You Salesian College Dimapur
Thursday, 15 March 2018
Be Helpful (speech for kids and junior students)
Wednesday, 7 February 2018
Abundant fruits of Passion!
Tuesday, 6 February 2018
Wednesday, 31 January 2018
Saturday, 27 January 2018
2018 a Milestone in Your Life
Saturday, 3 June 2017
Thinking of you
It is roughly about a year more, to be free from my vows. I want to wish you on you birthday, though it goes against my promise not to talk to you till I settle down properly. I will surely limit myself in talking to you for time-being.
What I know is I am in love with you very very much. My head is heavy without you. Now I realise that trying to stop from talking to you means denying my very self. I love you my soul-mate. I shall wait patiently for some more time. But I am sure even before I really achieve something in life, I will begin contact. We will be soon in union with each other in thought and words.
Love you my soul-mate.
PAIN MAKES SMILE
PAIN TO SMILE
THEY ARE HAPPY WHEN THEY ARE TOGETHER
THEY ARE HUSBAND AND WIFE
ALONE TO SMILE
WAIT TO SMILE
PAY TO SMILE
EARN TO SMILE
BE SOBER TO SMILE
THERE IS TIME FOR EVERYTHING
Monday, 20 February 2017
Directory 2017 (of Rongmei Priests Brothers and Nuns [RPBN])
Saturday, 19 November 2016
Jubilee Year of Mercy (Concluding: Prayer Service)
Wednesday, 9 November 2016
Spinoza
| Introduction |
| Life |
| Work | Back to Top |
Tuesday, 21 June 2016
Jesus God and Man
Jesus God and Man
Jesus, your love is beyond measure,
No one would give up so much for love,
As you, by giving up the glory of heaven
To live among us sharing our pain and sorrow.
The mystery is still inexplicable,
How God could choose to be a man
And a poor man born in a stable
Possessing not a place where to lay his head.
We are drawn by wealth and power
So we look for a God who is powerful.
To see God in you weak human form, dear Lord
Only faith can, not any human intelligence.
You had the whole world to choose from,
A Mother to give you birth
You chose not a royal maid,
But a humble maid, Mary of Nazareth.
You had the whole world to choose from,
A place to be born
You did not choose a royal palace
But a stable where animals are kept
Like a prince an easy life could have been yours
Avoiding work in sweat and fatigue.
To have your food through others labour
But that is not what you chose.
You preferred to earn you food
By the sweat of your brow
Working hard as a carpenter
Helping Joseph your foster father.
You chose to become a man
To establish your Father's Kingdom
By overthrowing the enemies of mankind,
Death and the devil, who claimed power over man
A bloody battle you had to wage,
Giving your life in sacrifice
To God, the Father, to win his pardon
For sinful men who had gone astray
(Fr. Karthikappallil Thomas)
Monday, 16 May 2016
The Essence of Love!
When St. Paul says, it is no longer I who live but Christ who lives in me, I believe what he meant was that I am allowing God's love to flow from me to every one. In this way, St. Paul becomes a true follower of Jesus Christ, the King of Love.
Tuesday, 10 May 2016
Whose footprints you follow?
Decide where you want to go and whom to follow....there are many people who just loiter without going forward.
Friday, 6 May 2016
As one moves about in his or her daily activities, one sets many goals to be achieved. Now, it is important to check out with what attitude one carries out one's daily tasks. In all that one does, if the focus is only to fulfil, then one is pushing oneself. However, if one does work to find happiness, new energy will flow in. Here one is pulled and not pushed.
Find happiness in all you do!
(Doing simple things in an extraordinary manner)
Friday, 29 April 2016
We all need guidance!
example: the plant that is well cared for and that received good manure will definitely bear much fruit and be healthy. likewise certain amount of care and guidance is required in every human person especially the youngsters.
Thursday, 3 March 2016
Hindsight on the course on Interpreting a Philosophical Text
Monday, 29 February 2016
Hindsight of a seminar on Interpreting a philosophical text
Saturday, 24 October 2015
Broken thoughts
Will you give all that a child asks?
Most probably not. You know what is good for the child and what is harmful; what is needed and what is desired.
There is an inner child in each one. Take care of your inner child and live life fully.
Broken thought!
Thursday, 15 October 2015
Summary of Beavers' article on Levinas
The Summary of the article: “Introducing Levinas to Undergraduate Philosophers” (by Anthony F. Beavers)
Down the philosophical history till today, there is a question that is lingering: “What is the source of the moral ‘ought’?” Let us examine three answers: Kant believes that it begins from reason, Utilitarianism propagates human desire for pleasure as the source and Thomas Aquinas traced it back to the will of God. Basically, our concept of good and evil will depend on this answer. For Levinas, ethics is, first and foremost, born on the concrete level of person to person contact. Therefore, it is the voice of the Other, who sanctions all our moral obligation. Thus, he is of the opinion that ethics come before reason.
Ethics occurs always in relation to the other persons. The root of Levinas’ concern is to establish the source of contact between persons or the source of interpersonal meaning, and in finding this meaning, Levinas finds the ethical. Ethics in a way shows that the Other is important: Kant’s Categorical Imperative indicates that the Other be treated as an end, Mill’s “principle of utility” implies the greatest happiness for greatest number, and St. Thomas says that harm should not be given to the Other.
It is still relevant to pursue the source of contact between persons, because the Other exists concretely and not as ideas. Levinas comes directly out of the tradition established by Descartes, Kant and Husserl. They give importance to consciousness and ideas. But these do not refer to independently existing persons, while ethics refers to real human beings who exist apart from one’s interpretations. To relate with the Other as an idea, means to deny the autonomy of the Other. For Levinas, this is a violence “totalization.” Totalization is a denial of the Other’s difference and the refusal to accept the otherness of the Other. If ethics presupposes the real Other then such tolalization will, in itself, be unethical.
It is obvious that the contact with the Other cannot be established through ideas. So, Levinas turns to sensibility to find the real Other. Sensibility precedes thought, it is passive and characterized primarily by enjoyment. In the encounter with the other Levinas, unlike Heidegger who looks at the things as tools and implements, views others as nourishments. The process of nourishment consists of enjoyment, wherein the other become the means of my satisfaction and part of me. So, enjoyment is the quenching of the memory of the thirst. It is clear that sensibility reaches further out into the domain of the extra-mental.
Having established subjectivity on the level of sensibility, Levinas points out that the Other cannot be met in the consciousness but on the concrete ground. Secondly, he also establishes that human subject is, first and foremost passive. The ethical moment, is found, for Levinas, on the level of sensibility when the egoist self comes across something that it wants to enjoy, something that it wants to make a part of itself, but cannot. That which the self wants to enjoy but cannot is the other person. The Other resists consumption. The Other is transcendent, beyond the categories of one’s thought. The epiphany of the face of the Other speaks thus: “I am not yours to be enjoyed: I am absolutely Other.” In other words, “Thou shalt not kill.”
The Other comes in surprise or in human rupture that one is caught off guard. It is not mere the perception of the other but more about the presence of the Other. To understand the ethical responsibility in Levinas, the concept of proximity and substitution are important. Proximity means the interpersonal contact. This implies responsibility for the Other. The very meaning of being a social subject is to be for-the-other. So, Levinas writes, “Subjectivity is being a hostage,” which means the Other is dominant and never reducible to other. Substitution means standing in the place of the Other. It arises from the self as held hostage by the Other. It is the means by which one responds to the Other before he or she knows. It is through substitution that one is not ‘another,’ but a different individual. It is the conversion of one’s being as a subjection by the Other into a subjection for the Other.
The notion of “responsibility” is important for Levinas. Responsibility means that in being a subject I am already in the grip of the Other. This paves a way to pass from an encounter with the real Other into ethics. Levinas writes: “I speak of responsibility as the essential, primary and fundamental mode of subjectivity. For I describe subjectivity in ethical terms. Ethics, here, does not supplement a preceding existential base; the very node of the subjective is knotted in ethics understood as responsibility. Thus, responsibility is the source of the moral “ought.” So, when we say responsibility is foundational for ethics and interpersonal relations we mean that the meaning of the Otherness of the Other is given in responsibility, and not in my interpretation of the Other. Therefore, the meaning of the Other is “the one to whom I am responsible.” Now, we come to the conclusion that the contact with the real Other becomes the source of the moral “ought.”
By Sebastian Kamsuan Guide: Fr. Felix sdb








